You know the fees are coming.
You do not know which ones.
Oblifee reads what the schemes and regulators publish, turns it into structured data, and puts it to work. Every figure carries the document it came from, the date we read it, and how sure we are. Nothing is asserted. You can check us before you trust us.
Every market · every regime · cited absences
Rigid plastic placed on the market in the United Kingdom, from 1 April 2026.
Defra EPR illustrative base fees 2026-27 · read 5 Aug 2026Every competitor will tell you a rate exists. This one tells you where it came from and how sure it is.
An empty cell and a proven no look identical. They are not the same thing.
Most of compliance is finding out that a duty does not apply to you. Everywhere else that answer arrives as silence, which is indistinguishable from nobody having looked. Here it arrives as a record, with the article that proves it, and it is scored exactly as a fact is.
The brain holds thousands of cited absences. Each one is a market that imposes no such duty, named and evidenced.
Article 63 requires the Commission to assess whether a deposit system for batteries should be introduced by 31 December 2027. It creates a duty to study, not a duty to charge. There is no battery deposit anywhere in the Union today.Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, Article 63 · read 11 Sep 2026
That single record answers the deposit question for twenty-seven markets, and answers it with the article rather than with a shrug.
One dataset, read live. These numbers are not typed into this page.
Markets held, from the European Union to the ones nobody else has opened
Duties modelled, each one a thing somebody must actually do
Fee rates, in the scheme's own units and currency
Cited absences: markets that impose no such duty, each naming the article that proves it
Read from the platform's own coverage feed when this page loaded · if it cannot be read, this page shows words rather than a stale number
Every one of these is a claim you can check on the first afternoon.
A figure you can put in front of an auditor
Source document, title, date accessed and a confidence status on every rate. A rate without a citation fails validation and never reaches the database, so there is no quiet fallback to somebody's best guess.
The same question answered the same way everywhere
One taxonomy across every market and every regime. The United Kingdom publishes one plastic figure, Oregon prices roughly forty sub-categories, and your system has one field. We hold all three and reconcile them.
Told before the invoice, not after it
Schemes revise fees mid-year and publish it in a PDF nobody emails you about. The monitor watches the pages that matter and dates every change, so a moved rate reaches you as a change rather than as a surprise.
An answer that tells you how sure it is
Confirmed, illustrative, estimate. Shown, never hidden behind an average. You decide what you are willing to book against, which is a decision only you can make and most tools quietly make for you.
A record that still proves itself next year
A check is sealed against the exact rules it ran on. Reopen it in twelve months and it can show it is out of date, and say what changed, without re-running anything.
The scheme's own units, kept
Per tonne, per kilo, per pound, per item, in the currency it was published in. Flattening everything into one unit loses the meaning, and the meaning is what you are being charged on.
It began with packaging fees. It answers every regime the brain holds.
The same product data answers all of them, because the expensive part was never the interface. It was building one model that holds a packaging tariff, a substance restriction and an on-pack warning without pretending they are the same shape.
Every duty across them · one taxonomy · one login
Your label, redesigned for the next market, and checked before you see it.
Upload the artwork you already have and choose your markets and a go-live date. You get back a redesigned front, back and peel label carrying what the law requires there on that date, every requirement cited with its status.
A paid module in three tiers, from £49 / mo, with AI runs included each month. Every workspace gets 3 free runs, once, to try it on your own artwork before choosing a tier.
Checks
- Net quantity and e mark
- Recycling and sorting marks
- Language
- Responsible person
- Scannable code on the back
- Nothing added that is not on your artwork or required
The monitor proposes. Only a person makes it true.
Automated where it should be, human where it has to be. A model that can publish its own findings is a model that can be confidently wrong at scale, so it is not allowed to.
- Watch the pages that matter
Regulators, schemes and gazettes, checked on a schedule, with the capture kept as evidence.
- Read the instrument, not the summary
The article, in its own language, from the publisher of the law. A consultancy's write-up is a lead, never a citation.
- Propose, with the receipt attached
Every proposed change arrives as a reviewable record carrying its source, its date and its confidence.
- A person decides
Nothing reaches the database without a human merge. The build refuses a rate that has no citation, and refuses a record that would quietly drop another.
The answer turns on a fact nobody asked you for.
Ask who carries a duty and most tools answer the general case, leaving you to notice what was assumed. Obli refuses to guess. When a rule turns on a fact it does not hold, it asks for that one fact, records your answer, and only then answers you.
Who is responsible for EPR on this product in Hungary?
I can see it carries your customer's brand and ships from the United Kingdom, so it enters from outside the Union. One thing decides the rest: how does it reach Hungarian buyers?
Then your customer carries it. As the brand owner they are the manufacturer, the importer, and the Hungarian producer for EPR. You have no packaging duty for these units.
three articles cited · recorded on the product, so it is not asked twiceEveryone covers the rules. Almost nobody publishes the rate.
Eighteen competitors, read on their own public pages. This is what each will and will not show a customer.
| Who | Publishes the rate | Cites the source | Dates the check | Status per figure | Published price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oblifee | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Regulatory intelligence suites | No | No | Not published | No | No |
| Schemes and consultancies | Partial | Partial | No | No | No |
| EPR software | Partial | No | Not published | Not published | No |
| ERP-native modules | Partial | No | Not published | No | No |
| Self-serve report apps | No | No | No | No | Yes |
The one competitor that cites properly covers a single country. The best funded keeps its rates behind a login with no stated source. Nobody occupies the position this product is built on, which is the only reason a company this size can hold it.
ERP agnostic, deliberately.
Connect
Odoo, Shopify and Squarespace today, with revocable per-tenant tokens. Products and volumes arrive on their own and stay current.
Push
Any other system, through an API that takes your shape rather than demanding ours. Entitlement enforced per tenant.
Upload
A spreadsheet in whatever layout it already has. The mapping is proposed, you confirm it before anything loads, and personal data is stripped.
Nobody has to move their stack to find out what they owe. That is the whole design constraint, and it is why this sits beside your systems rather than asking to replace one.
Bring one SKU and one market.
We will show you the receipts.
Oblifee is in beta and access is arranged by a person, so there is no sign-up button on this site. Tell us where you sell and we will check it against the brain before we reply.